When I read about Elizabeth Gilbert’s memoir Eat, Pray, Love, on which the 2010 film
is based, I had little interest in what sounded more like a journey of
self-indulgence than an authentic spiritual quest. Perhaps that was unfair.
When a friend recommended Gilbert’s 2013 novel, I decided to
give it a try.
The Signature of All
Things is also a quest narrative. The
first part reads like a classic success story, as her father rises from poverty
in 18th century England to wealth in Philadelphia through his
application of botanical knowledge to the development of early
pharmaceuticals. His daughter Alma is
born into wealth and focuses her 19th century quest on the
acquisition of botanical knowledge, not only for practical application, but for
its own sake, though she also seeks achievement and recognition in the
scientific community.
Alma’s professional quest is paralleled by her personal
quest for romantic and sexual fulfillment.
This quest leads her into a misguided marriage in which a mystery arises
regarding her husband’s sexuality, and she is as bound and determined to solve
that mystery as she is to solve the mysteries of the natural world.
At this point the
narrative becomes like a detective story, as Alma, after her father’s death,
gives up her inheritance to her adopted sister and devotes herself to tracking
down her late husband’s secrets. This
journey takes her to Tahiti, where her professional and personal quests
intersect.
She learns more about her husband (as well as the Polynesian
people and the Christian missionary outreach), enjoys a moment of sexual
fulfillment, and, through a personal experience, not scientific study, achieves
an intellectual breakthrough in her understanding of nature.
Alma develops her own theory of the survival instinct and
natural selection but fails to publish it because she feels the theory is
incomplete. Darwin, of course, publishes
The Origin of Species in 1859 and
later The Descent of Man, achieving world
recognition for the theory that Alma had also formulated.
What was and perhaps still is incomplete about the theory is
the problem of altruism. Given
evolutionary theory, why do humans individually and in groups, make sacrifices
in order to assist and promote others’ well-being, even save others’ lives,
often at their own expense? Multiple
theories have been developed to explain how human altruistic behavior might
have evolved, but there is still no good account for how it might have
pre-evolved in the non-human world. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruism#Evolutionary_explanations)
In the end Alma must accept the limits of human knowledge,
not only in the intellectual, scientific realm, but also in her personal
life. As much as she discovers about her
husband’s secrets, there are unanswered questions that remain shrouded in
mystery.
The historical backdrop to Alma’s story includes the role of
women in the 19th century, the increasing reliance on science as an
authority for truth, the colonizing outreach of Christian missionaries, and the
conflict between religion and science, of which creationism vs. evolution is
but one example.
Western imperialism and race relations also figure in the
narrative. Alma’s father participates in
the European western expansion, making his fortune exploiting plant life around
the world before settling in Philadelphia.
Alma’s adopted sister, Prudence, becomes an abolitionist, and Alma
herself lives among the Polynesians in Tahiti, where Christian missionaries
have established a Western foothold.
The novel moves from the Old World of Europe to the
so-called New World of North America to the Third World of Tahiti and ends in
Holland where Alma, having abandoned her estate in Philadelphia to Prudence,
connects with her mother’s Dutch family.
This movement parallels Alma’s own journey of exploration,
expansion, and discovery, her almost imperialistic thirst for control through
scientific and personal knowledge, and her final retreat and acceptance of
limits to the power of knowledge and to her own ego.
But what of the title, The
Signature of All Things? It is
borrowed from Jacob Boehme’s 1621 work by that title. Boehme was a Christian mystic who argued that
God had imprinted a message in every plant and flower, a kind of secret code
that he called “the signature of all things.”
Similar to 19th century Transcendentalism, nature is an
outward expression of spiritual truth.
In this view, science becomes a way of reading, not simply the material
world, but the mind of God.
Alma is a scientific materialist, but she marries Ambrose, a
Christian mystic who follows the teachings of Jacob Boehme. Turns out Ambrose wants a chaste marriage, or
as he calls it a marriage blanc, much
to Alma’s disappointment. It also turns
out that Ambrose is most likely a repressed homosexual, who has displaced his
sexuality into religion.
This dilemma results from a huge miscommunication between
Alma and Ambrose, leading them to think they are both on the same page
regarding the expectations for their marriage.
The friend who recommended Gilbert’s novel to me pointed out
that this misunderstanding is only one of many mistakes Alma makes when it
comes to “reading” other people. As
brilliant as she is when it comes to unearthing the (material) secrets of
nature, she is clueless when it comes to understanding human beings. And perhaps herself. Her obsession with knowledge and control may
well be a displacement of her own frustrated sexuality into science. Does her blindness to humanity prevent her
from seeing beyond the material world to spiritual truths?
Perhaps, but in the end, having been chastened by the
recognition of her failures in human relationships, Alma comes to respect
those, such as Alfred Russel Wallace, who see in science a religious
revelation, and to accept her own limitations, neither converting to a
religious world view nor denying spiritual reality. In the final image of the narrative, Alma is
leaning against a tree, held up by it really, as if nature were all she needed
for support.
The Signature of All
Things is a kind of historical novel in that it features actual historical personages,
such as Captain Cook, Jacob Boehme, Charles Darwin, and Alfred Russel Wallace,
as well as the backdrop of Western imperialism, colonialism, white supremacy,
women’s roles, sexual repression, and class privilege in the late 18th
and 19th centuries.
We know now that there were important women scientists,
activists, and leaders in history who remained invisible until 20th
century feminist scholars began lifting them up. Gilbert’s novel offers an imaginary portrait
of such an invisible woman, who resists almost every female stereotype of its
time period. Far from conforming to the
Cult of True Womanhood (domesticity, piety, purity, submissiveness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Domesticity),
Alma is professionally active, atheistic, sexually alive (if not fulfilled),
outspoken, and assertive. At the same
time the novel presents a realistic version of the classic quest myth with a
classically larger-than-life and classically flawed heroine.
Very well thought out. Thanks for mentioning it in your comments. I enjoyed reading this. Regarding altruism, I sometimes wonder if some beings have an urge to help others because if they do so they help all others, including themselves. --Hanni
ReplyDeleteThanks, Hanni. Good thought!
Delete